The general belief is that the prophet Muhammad married, at 52 years old, Aïsha when she was only 6, and that he consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. It is also believed that Khadija was 40 years old when the prophet married her at 25.
We only know the ages of Aïsha and Khadija from the Hadiths, and no other external source corroborates this information. The Quran does not mention the ages and the names of the prophet's wives.
Aïsha reported that the prophet married her whe she was 6 and that he consummated his marriage when she was 9, and that she stayed with him during 9 years (ie until his death). Sahih Bukhari Vol. 7, L. 62, No 64
Aïsha reported that the prophet married her whe she was 6 and that he consummated his marriage when she was 9. Hisham said: I was informed that Aïsha stayed with the prophet during 9 years (ie until his death). Sahih Bukhari Vol 7, L 62, No 65
Muhammad Ibn Omar [al-Waqidi] reported that al-Munzar Ibn Abdullah al-Hizami reported that Musa Ibn Uqba Abi Habiba, the freed slave of Al Zubair said that he heard Hakim Ibn Hizam saying: "The messenger of Allah married Khadija when she was 40 and him 25. Khadija was 2 years more than me. She was born 15 years before the episode of the elephant, and me 13 years before.." Ibn Sa’d, Muhammad, Tabaqat al-Kubra, Beirut: Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyya, 1990, Vol.8, 13
To Use your own reason and reflexion
If the muslims had used their own reason and discernment, rather than persisting in following blindly their savants of islam and their so called "Sunnah of the prophet", they would have realized without difficulty that their islamic beliefs, including this false story forged against the prophet, are the pure invention of the Devil. Allah commands us to not be guided by our own desires, but rather by the truth, even if it goes against our own established beliefs.
Do not follow the passions. S4:V135
Many people lead astray, without knowledge, by their passions. S6:V119
And they will say: «If we had listened or reasoned, we would not be among the people of the Blaze». S67:V10
Thus, do We explain our Signs in detail to a people that use their reason. S30:V28
The fact that the hadiths which concern the age of Aïsha are classified as being "sahih/authentic", does not exempt us from submitting them to our own critical sense. Allah invites us to submit to our critical sense the least information which comes to us, including the Quran itself, because blind belief does not help, and Allah, contrary to the sects that call themselves "religions", doesn't want us to obey with reflecting and understanding His commands. So, if even the Quran shall be questioned, it is obvious that the Hadiths shall be even more questioned.
Yet, the islamic approach is completely opposed to what Allah avocates. What the muslims are taught, is rather the blind belief and obedience to all what is issued from their islamic chain of transmission of Hadiths, a chain of transmission through the most prominent savants of islam... And above all, the muslims are told that they shall not rely on their own reflection, otherwise they would be deceived by the Devil without even realizing it, but they shall rather follow the advice of the experts of islam, in priority on their own opinion. Yet, Allah invites us to use own own reason and to rely only on concrete and logic proofs in order to determine our choices, and to not be blinded by our emotions, and to not reject the truth even when it goes against our own established beliefs. By applying this method, we'll be able to come closer to the truth and to depart from falsehood... while those who persist invariably in their own fixed beliefs, will remain all their life in their illusion of truth, and will fail both on earth and in the hereafter.
The muslims of today still believe in this lie forged against the prophet Muhammad, and ackowledge it as the truth, because of their blind confidence in their great savants of islam, who have confirmed this story to them generation after generation. Yet, Allah warns that we shall not follow the passions of those who went astray and misled a lot of people with them: this refers to these prominet savants of islam that the muslims consider as models guiding to God.
Do not follow the passions of people who went astray in times gone by, and who misled many, and strayed (themselves) from the even Way. S5:V77
The Prophet is on high standards of morality
Precisely, those who were supposed to be the guardians of the prophet's honor, reveal themselves to be those who have destroyed it the most... Yet, Allah certifies Muhammad's high standards of morality in the Quran, and Allah is the Defender of the Truth and the Guardian of his prophets' legacy.
And verily, you are on high standards of morality. S68:V4
Can we truly consider a 52 years old man who marry a 6 years old little girl and who consumates his marriage with her when she is 9, as a decent man with "high standards of morality"? Some versions say that Aïsha was 10 when she married the prophet, others raise the bids until 18 years old... but that does not really change anything to this issue, it still remains an iniquitous marriage. In all times and societies, this kind of marriage has always been considered as indecent and shameful ... no decent man would ever take part to this kind of union, and less likely the noble prophet of God.
The prophet's marriage with Aïsha: only case observed to this day
Some of you may think that this practice was common in the Arab society at the time of the prophet... But, not a single hadith or other historical source never confirmed that this practice was in use in the prophet's society. If this kind of practice was perceived negatively even in the eye of the pagan Law, the Quran is unlikely to promote it. In fact, to this day, the only reported case of this type of marriage within the society of the prophet, is the one of the prophet with Aïsha, and this story has one single source: the Hadiths... Was Only the noble prophet of God involved in this abject practice ??? You shall not question the prophet's honor, but rather the authenticity of the hadiths which are at the origin of this false rumor.
The Quran does not allow this type of marriage
In term of contracts, including marriage contracts, the Quran prescribes that the signatory parties of the contract shall be mature enough to be able to have their own discernment and consent. How a 6 years old little girl, who can barely think and speak, may be able to subscribe to the least contract? Therefore, it is impossible, that the prophet, at more than 50, could have contracted such an iniquitous marriage with a 6 years old little girl, who is completely unable to decide for herself, and cannot even bear a child. If this was truly the case, this marriage would be without any doubt unlawful according to the rule of the Quran.
Do not pass on rumors without proofs
The true question that you shall ask yourself: how can we think just for one second that the prophet of God may have contracted such an horrible marriage? This would mean that Allah endorses pedophilia? Thinking so or even being open to it, just illustrates the sickness that some people have in their heart. Pedophilia is a pure act of perversion and destruction, without any contest, it is a pratice of the Devil and not of God. This obssession for the young virgens is in fact proper to the satanist people.
Wherefore, when ye heard it, did not the believing men and believing women imagine best of their own people and say: this is a calumny manifest! S24:S12
When ye were publishing it with your tongues and saying that with your mouths of which ye had no knowledge, and ye thought it to be a light matter, while it was most serious in the sight of Allah. And wherefore, when ye heard it, did ye not say: it is not for us to speak thereof, hallowed be Thou! that is a slander mighty! Allah exhorteth you lest ye may ever revert to the like thereof, if ye are believers indeed. S24:15-17
Those who love that turpitude should be spread among the believers, will have a grievous Penalty in this life and in the Hereafter: Allah knows and ye know not. S24:V19
These verses apply to all those who have propagated this slander, including the muslims of today who are still propagating it. How can the muslims pretend to value the prophet in higher esteem, and at the same time, believe that he truly married Aïsha when she was only 6 !?
O ye who believe! avoid conjecture as much (as possible): for conjecture in some cases is a sin. S49:V12
Conjecturing negatively about a decent man, in this case the prophet Muhammad, without the least concrete proof, is definitely a sin. Is your commitment for the Hadiths more important than the defense of the prophet's honor? Instead of denying the authenticity of the Hadiths, the muslims prefer to remain attached to them in order to not upset their belief system, mainly based on the Hadiths... Whereas, they rather should take advantage of this opportunity in order to question all the false beliefs conveyed by the Hadiths, and to be grateful to God for making them realize the truth concerning their false beliefs, and to come to the right conclusions by dropping once for all the Hadiths, in order to come back to the direct study of the Quran... a book that the muslims have deserted for long, and the prophet Muhammad will be a witness against them during the Judgement Day.
And the Messager will say: « Lord, my people have truly abandoned this Quran !». S25:V31
Aïsha and the Battle of Badr
According to the Hadiths, the prophet Muhammad get married with Aïsha in 623 when she was 6 years old, and these same Hadiths tell us that Aïsha took part to the Battle of Badr in 624, ie at 7 or 11 according to the versions. According to the search of Habib Ur Rahman across the Hadiths, that he published in his book "A Research Work, Age of Aïsha" (PDF version), the rule which was in use at that time only authorize men older than 15 on the battlefield. So how Aïsha could have taken part to this battle, while she does not meet the minimum requirements? No matter the explanation, anyway, bringing such a young little girl on the battlefield is non sense, and the prophet Muhammad is not used to take non sense decisions... Either Aïsha has never been at the Battle of Badr, or she was not 7 ou 11 during this episode. What is sure and certain is that these 2 assertions cannot be both true at the same time.
The false rumor against Aïsha
The Quran enlightens us concerning this episode by reporting the story of the Battle of Badr, confirming the effective presence of one of the prophet's wives on the battlefield, in this case Aïsha, given the date of the battle. The Quran even mentions a significant episode which happened during this battle, and which involved the wife of the prophet, Aïsha. The Quran does not provide the detail of this episode, but reports that Aïsha was involved in a false rumor of a sexual nature.
The version of the Hadiths concerning this episode reports that Aïsha, while she was camping with the troops, realized that she had forgotten her necklace at their last camp. So, she decided to look for it, but she was delayed during her trip, and when she came back, everybody was gone, so she turned back again to the last camp thinking, that some soldiers were sent at her search, and once there, she felt asleep. Safwan bin Al-Muattal As-Sulami Adh-Dhakwani, who was charged to follow the back of the troops, find her asleep during the night, and took her on his camel to the heart of the troops, and then the false rumor involving Aïsha and Safwan started.
In fact, no matter whether this story is true or not, what matters is that the Quran confirms us that this rumor was indeed of a sexual nature and was targeting one of the prophet's wives. Therefore, it is not the presence of the prophet's wife during this battle which is questioned, but rather her age at this battle.
This brings us to the important point: if Aïsha was truly 6 or 10 at her marriage with the prophet (in 623), thus 7 (or 11 according to the version) during the Battle of Badr (in 624), how is it possible that she can be the object of a sexual scandal, if she is not even old enought to have any sexual intercourse? Safwan, engaged adult, would have sex with a 7 years old (of 11) little girl ... in addition the wife of the prophet? According to the Hadiths, it seems that pedophilia was common at that time...
The Quran never mentions an historical fact without purpose, but always in order to restore the truth about this very same fact. Therefore, if Allah has reported this story about Aïsha in the Quran, it is because Allah knows the past, the present, and the future, and that Allah was aware that this lie on the marriage of the prophet Muhammad with Aïsha will last up to the present day, more than 12 centuries after its forgery!
Fortunately, what the Quran reveals us concerning Aïsha is enough to disqualify this forged story about her marriage with the prophet. As Allah has confirmed us the presence of Aïsha during this battle and the sexual scandal involving her, Aïsha could not be 7 (or 11) during this battle, but was certainly a mature woman, old enough to justify her presence on a battlefield and to be the object of a sexual scandal.
Aïsha, among the first 20 believers
Another anomaly, according to the Hadiths, Aïsha was among the first 20 believers, how is that possible if Aïsha was not even born when the prophet Muhammad started his mission? According to the Hadiths, Muhammad started his mission in 610, and Aïsha was born in 613, so this assertion is not compatible with her age. Aïsha was certainly born far before this date, in order to count among the first believers ... and indeed she certainly was one of them.
Aïsha, expert in preislamic poetry
Aïsha was also reknown for being an expert in preislamic poetry. How could she be an expert in preislamic poetry, while this practice have been abandoned after the revelation of the Quran? Indeed, poetry which was very popular before the revelation of the Quran, became marginal after this date because the people had found true wisdom through the Quran, and had therefore realized that poetry was only false wisdom and flowery discourses.
As for the poets, they are followed by the straying people. Did you not see that they wander in every valley and that they say what they do not? S26:V224-226
Its is unlikely that Aïsha, as an acknowleged expert in preislamic poetry, may be born at a time when poetry was abandoned. Above all, Aïsha, as the wife of the prophet, served as a model for the believers, therefore, it is hard to imagine her studying poetry in place of the Quran. The only valid explanation is that Aïsha was much older than the Hadiths claim, and that she had acquired her expertise in presilamic poetry far before the beginning of the Revelation.
Urwah bin Az-Zubair reported: "I've never seen someone more expert than Aïsha concerning the Quran, what is lawful and unlawful, genealogy and Arab poetry. That's why, even the wisest companions of the prophet consulted Aïsha in order to solve complex matters. Jala-ul-Afham par Ibn Qaiyem et Ibn Sa'ad, Vol.2, P.26
We also have the confirmation through this Hadith that Aïsha was a mature and knowledged woman, which explains her presence during the Battle of Badr.
The prophet never attacked concerning his marriage with Aïsha
Another relevant point, How is it possible that no enemy of the prophet ever used his marriage with Aïsha in order to mock him? You can imagine how the marriage of a 52 years old man with a 6 years old little girl is like bread for the detractors of the prophet... So why no hadith ever reported any episode in which the prophet is attacked by his enemies concerning his mariage with Aïsha? Simply, because this marriage was absolutely decent, and Aïsha never was 6 years old when she married the prophet, but was a fully mature woman.
The 13 rapporteurs of the hadiths concerning the age of Aïsha
There are only 13 rapporteurs at the origin of the hadiths concerning the age of Aïsha, and all of them orginate from Iraq: 9 from Kufa, and 4 from Basra. No other rapporteur from Mecca, Medina or anywhere else have ever confirmed their story... This seems to be a set up against the prophet, knowing that Iraq was at that time the bastion of the Persian counter-attack against the Islamic World.
After their crushing defeat at al-Qadisiyyah (in 636), to everyone's surprise, the Persian elites, sworn enemies of the Arabs, started pushing their people to adopt Islam in mass, as their new religion instead of Zoroastrism. This strategy allowed them to infiltrate the highest instances of islam and to destroy Religion from inside, by progressively introducing, thanks to an almost industrial production of forged hadiths, their pagan traditions and beliefs in the pure religion of Allah. As they cannot attack the Quran, their strategy was to marginalize the direct study of the Quran and to reinterpret all its verses through the eye of the Hadiths ... that they have themselves forged.
It is reported in a hadith, that Ibn Hisham said, at a time when he was still living in Medina (it is said that after that, he lost his mind and forged a lot of false hadiths):
When an iraqi report 1000 hadiths, you should immediately reject 990 of them, and be even more suspicious about the 10 remaining ones.
It is an expert in Hadiths' forgery who is speaking, Ibn Hisham, at least we can trust him in this field...
The Persian Conspiracy through the Hadiths
After the victory of the Muslims on the Persians during the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah, the Calpih Omar invited Rostam, the Persian army chief, and asked him what were the reasons of their defeat. Rostam responded him that the difference is that, before, they were only fighting against men, but now they are fighting against men, but also... against Allah by their side.
The Persian Empire was still at that time an hegemonic empire with strong state structures. In fact, this defeat was not the real reason of this sudden reversal: their massive conversion to islam. For having experienced to their detriment what is to fight against men of faith, the Persian elites took very seriously this new threat, and elaborated a secret plan to eradicate all faith in God, in order to revert the Arabs to their previous state, completely at the mercy of the Persians. They have fully succeeded in this enterprise, by introducing progressively a great number of forged hadiths, with the secret complicity of the Abassid regime, in order to corrupt the pure religion of God with their pagan traditions, and to take back their control on the people.
The most prominent collectors of Hadiths, all Persians!
Is it not strange that all the prominent collectors of Hadiths are exclusively Persian instead of being Arab?
- Tabari
- Boukhari
- Mouslim
- Dawoud
- Bin Majah
- Tirmidhi
Are not the Arabs more entitled to tell their own story, as the prophet was among their own people? Yet, the pantheon of the Hadiths' collectors is exclusively composed of Persians... Does islam originates in the Arab world or in the Persian World? Yet, the Arabs seem to accept the fact that the Persians, their sworn enemies to this day, have stolen their history and have corrupted it... and now the Arabs are in trouble because of their recklessness.
The first translation of the Quran in Persian!
In the same vein, between the 10th and 12th century, the Quran has been translated for the first time in a foreign language ... the Persian !!! A translation which stick to the Hadiths that they have themselves forged, and which distort the naturally explicit sense of the Quranic verses. It is from this Persian translation that all the other translations have been done, including the versions of today. This scheme allowed the enemies of God to misinterpret the verses of the Quran in order to make them match with the lies that Tabari, Bukhari & Co have forged on behalf of the Persian and Abasid elites. Each verse of the Quran has been attached to an alleged episode of the prophet Muhammad's life, and finds its interpretation in the hadiths related to this episode. Any other interpretation of the verses of the Quran, based on logic and reason, personal reflection, common sense, concrete proofs, is not allowed in the new sectarian version of islam... Yet, God prescribes us to study the Quran following this methodology.
Tabari's methodology to collect the Hadiths
Tabari, considered as the greatest historian of islam, author of the first and most important collection of Hadiths, revealed in his book, how he proceeded in order to compile his famous collection of Hadiths. He explains that he doesn't rely on any logic or common sense, or personal reflection in order to qualify a hadith as sahih/authentic or false, but that he only relies on its chain of transmission!!!
In his book "Tarikh Al Rousoul Wal Moulouk", which means "History of the Prophets and Kings", Tabari reveals in the first volume of his book: "General Introduction and from the Creation to the Flood" at page 170:
"The reader should know that with respect to all I have mentioned and made it a condition to set down in this books of ours, I rely upon traditions and reports which I have transmitted and which I attribute to their transmitters:I rely only very exceptionally upon what is learned throught rational arguments and produced by internal though process. For no knowledge of the history of men of the past and of recent men and events is attainanle by those who were not able to observe them and di not live in their time, except through information and transmission provided by informants and transmitters. This knowledge cannot be brought out by reason or produced by internal thought processes. This book of mine may be found to contain some information mentioned by us on the authority of certain men of the past, which the reader may disapprove of and the listener may find detestable, because he can find nothing sound and no real meaning in it. In such casesm he should know that it is not our fault that such information comes to him, but the fault of someone who transmitted is to us. We have merely reported it as it was reported to us."
In other terms, Tabari considers a hadith as sahih/authentic if its chain of transmission is estimated as "reliable" ... In a context in which religion has been politicized, the so called "reliability" of a transmitter is very relative, knowing that a single corruption in the chain of transmission has for result the corruption of the whole chain.
Tabari's dream
Only the personal story of Tabari should raise some suspicions from the muslim part ... It is quite obvious that the portrait of Tabari is a complete forgey, see this extract from his book:
"As an old man probably in his seventies, Tabari recalled that he knew the Quran by heart whe he was seven (!!!), served as prayer leader when he was eight (!!!!), and studied traditions of the Prophet when he was nine. This remark may sound a little boastful, but there is no reason to doubt it (there are all the reasons of the world to doubt it)"
All the reknown Hadiths' collectors share the same kind of boastful fake portrait, they are presented as saints, only this point is enough to raise your suspicion! It is just impossible for a 7 years old boy to know the Quran by heart ... btw, Allah never commands us to learn the Quran by heart, but rather advocates us to masterize its concepts... which is a complete different thing! Leading the prayer at 8, this is another non sense and lie, but as the muslims idolize their so called great islamic characters such as Tabari, Bukhari, ..., they are completely blinded by their idolatry and do not even realize the blatant lies which are presented in their portrait.
According to islam, it is a good thing to learn by heart the Quran and to study the tradition of the prophet, while Allah never prescribes such a thing but rather invites us to understand and apply on ourselves the concepts of the Quran instead of learning it by heart, and to obey to the direct and clear verses of the Quran and not to the so called Sunnah of the Prophet. The average muslim uses the Quran as a mere recitation, and seek wisdom in the Hadiths instead of the Quran, while we are commanded to obey the direct commands of the Quran. Islam and the true religion of Allah are 2 distinct religions, which have nothing to do one with another. To confirm the true evil enterprise of Tabari, see this dream that his father had about him when he still was a boy (page 15 of "General Introduction and from the Creation to the Flood"):
"My father", Tabari reminisced, "had a dream concerning me: He saw me standing before the Prophet with a bag filled with stones, and I was spreading some of them in front of him". A dream interpreter told my father that the dream signified that I would be a good Muslim as an adult and a strong defender of the religious law of the Prophet (it is the exact opposite). As a consequence, my father was ready to support my studies when I was still a small boy".
This dream is amazing!!! The true signification of this dream is quite obvious, and is the exact opposite to the interpretation given by the muslims. The fact that Tabari saw himself before the prophet is not positive, because the real believers should be behind the prophet, this position rather shows that Tabari actually bars the way to the prophet, ie he is an enemy of the prophet and of the true religion... This is confirmed with Tabari seeing himself spreading stones in front of the prophet, the interpretation of this scene is even more obvious: the stones that Tabari is spreading in front of the prophet stand for the false path that he will draw through the Hadiths, on the behalf of the prophet... while the true path of the prophet was only to follow God and the Quran alone.
The islamic Methodology to evaluate the Hadiths
The muslims of today follow the exact same method than Tabari, ie they only evaluate the Hadiths on the basis of their chain of transmission and never on the basis of their content... In fact, we are not questioning the reliability of the 1400 years old islamic chain of tranmission, because this chain has worked very well, the proof of that: The muslims of today still follow the exact same non sense barbaric false beliefs than 1000 years ago. What the muslims have missed is the fact that their Hadiths have been forged from scratch since the very first day of their creation, including the list of transmitters which is associated to each hadith. Even if you transmit faithfully a lie, it still remains a lie...
The muslims could not do better to remain blocked in their thousand years old false beliefs. They are taught to reject systematically any information which go against their own established islamic beliefs, even if this information is issued from Hadiths acknowledged as sahih/authentic, or from one of their prominent savants of islam. The proof of that: Tabari, that the muslims consider as the absolute reference in islamic history, reveals in his book that he is not responsible for the content of the Hadiths, but that only their transmitters are, no matter how these hadiths may be non sense and abject... but no reaction from the muslims, except that they keep following blindly their savants of islam, and their legacy: the Hadiths. Instead of criticizing Tabari's dumb methodology, the muslims have rather chosen to adopt it!!!
When it is said to them: "Follow what Allah has revealed" they say: "No! we shall follow the legacy of our fathers." What! even though their fathers knew nothing about nothing and have never been well guided? S2:V170
These are the verses of Allah, which We recite to you with truth. Then in which HADITH after Allah and His verses will they believe? S45:V6
When Allah and the Quran are mentioned alone, the muslims run away, but when their "associates" are mentioned, ie their prominent savants of islam, the companions of the prophet or the prophet Muhammad himself, the muslims rejoice.
And when Allah Alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who believe not in the Hereafter feel uncomfortable, but when those besides Him (the prophet, the companions, the savants, the angels...) are mentioned, behold, they rejoice! S39:V45
And most of them do not believe in Allah except though association. S12:V106
The savants of islam and the muslims can legitimately be considered as "associates", as the muslims have adopted them as their guides, and the savants have accepted to play this rôle, which is normally exclusively reserved to God!!! Most of the traditionalist muslims are not true believers, as they do not have a direct relationship with God ... These people are depicted by God as "associators/mushrikin", and their fate is hell with the disbelievers and the hypocrites.
Verily it is We Who have revealed the Book to thee in Truth: so serve Allah and dedicate to him the whole religion. Is not Religion the exclusive property of Allah? But those who take for protectors other than Allah (say): “We only obey them in order that they may bring us nearer to Allah.” Truly Allah will judge between them in that wherein they differ. But Allah guides not the great liar and deniers. S39:V2-3
Are not the muslims expert in persistently denying any new truth that God manifests to them? Even if their beliefs have been proven to be wrong, the muslims still prefer to remain attached to them, because they simply do not want to change their path, they are not interested by the truth, but only by following their own desires ... They think that they can deceive Allah and the whole world, but this verse shows that, in truth, it is Allah who has deceived them, and Allah perfectly knows the "liars and deniers" that most of the muslims are. We can bet that most of the muslims who will read this article will not change anything to their beliefs ... their hearts are full of laziness, and the path to which Allah invites them disgust them. Therefore, Allah has cursed them and condemned them to remain blocked in their own unfair and dumb beliefs until His final punishment falls on them.
Tabari, not the first historian of islam!
Contrary to the common islamic belief, Tabari was not the first historian of islam, but many other historians of islam have lived far before him. These historians can at least claim to be genuine Arabs and not Persians, and have truly lived at the time of the prophet (Tabari, Bukhari,... lived more than 200 years after the prophet's death). Therefore, these historians are far more entitled than Tabari, Bukhari & Co to reveal the truth about that period, and were historians by occupation and not self claimed historians like Tabari and his fellows. We can therefore expect their work to be far more accurate and impartial.
Abdul Jabbar Qaramati: first biographer of the prophet
Among the historians which are not acknowledged by islam, there is a certain Abdul Jabbar Qaramati who published a book entitled “Tathbit Dala’ail mine Nabouwate Siyidina Muhammad", which means "Production of proofs concerning the Revelations of the prophet Muhammad". Published more than 150 years before Tabari, it is to the his day the most ancient book about the life of the prophet Muhammad. There is only one single manuscript copy of this book, which remains carefuly hidden from the eye of the public in a museum of Istanbul. Being Arab, Abdul Jabbar, is an exception among the historians of islam, who were mostly Persians. Contrary to the prominent official historians of islam, Abdul Jabbar was not a novice in this field, as he published more than 70 books about all the religions, including islam.
Aïsha was 48 at her marriage!
Abdul Jabbar reports in his book that Aïsha married the prophet Muhammad when she was... 48 years old!!!!
We are very far from the 6 years old (or 10) reported by the so called historians of islam! A marriage between a widower of 52 and a widow of 48, nothing shocking in this marriage.
The book of Abdul Jabbar mentions that Aïsha was the widow of Salah Bin Salah Ataib, and therefore was neither a divorced woman nor a spinster, nor a virgen. After the death of Khadija, the prophet remained single during 3 years, and only when he was 52, under the insistence of his friends, he finally accepted to remarry with Aïsha who was 48 ... a decent marriage in all points!
Aïsha, the sister of Abu Bakr
We also learn in the book of Abdul Jabbar, that Aïsha was not the daughter of Abu Bakr, but rather his sister... This relation is perfectly compatible with her age of 48. It is common to see a man marrying the sister of his friend, this kind of marriage are even perceived as virtuous, given the close ties which bond 2 friends... but a man who marries the daughter of his friend, more than 40 years younger than him, this looks like a treason ... and it is perceived by the general public as an abomination!
One of the rare non mulim historians who have studied islam at the time of the prophet Muhammad, the American writer and reporter Lesley Hazleton, corroborates this story, confirming that Aïsha was not the daughter of Abu Bakr, but rather his sister. In her book intitled "After the prophet: the epic story of the Shia-Sunni split in Islam", which deals with the beginning of the division between the Shias and the Sunnis in islam, the historian Lesley Hazleton reported in an extract where Aïsha was talking to Muawiya:
The true age of Khadija at her marriage: 25 years old!
In relation to this topic, it is interesting to investigate the true age of Khadija at her marriage with the prophet. The Hadiths reports that she was 40 and the prophet 25. These very same Hadiths report that Khadija was married twice before to marry the prophet, and that she only get from these 2 marriages, 2 x 2 children, ie 4 children,.. and that after 40, she had 7 children with the prophet!!!
In an age when women are supposed to be fertile, Khadija had only 4 children with 2 different husbands, while in an age when most of the women are infertile, Khadija managed to get 7 children with 1 husband... In the best scenario, Khadija would have given birth to her last child after 50 years old ... Obviously, the version of the Hadiths cannot be true!
In his book, "A Research Work, Age of Aïsha", Habib Ur Rahman discovered through his search across the Hadiths, that Khadija was not 40 when she married the prophet, but rather 25, ie the exact same age than the prophet... this sounds much more plausible!
The same scenario but this time with the right age: 48 for Aïsha, and 25 for Khadija
Now if we replay the differents scenarios that we've previously played, but this time by considering the true ages of Aïsha and Khadija, then everything makes sense and becomes consistent:
The first marriage of the prophet was a decent and common marriage between 2 young persons of 25 years old. The enemies of God have turned the prophet Muhammad into a kind of gigolo, offering his youth to a 40 years old rich widow, in order to rise in society.
The same scheme, but this time reversed when it come to his marriage with Aïsha. This time the prophet is depicted as an aging man, who seeks consolation in the arms of a 6 years old little girl... This is no more than pedophilia, a practice universally condemned in all times and societies, whether religious or secular.
Aged 48 years old at her marriage with the prophet in 623, Aïsha was old enought to learn preislamic poetry, as she lived decades before islam. The Revelation started in 610, so Aïsha had 35 years to study in deep Arabic poetry, at a time when this art was still at its peak.
According to the Quran, Aïsha took part to the Battle of Badr and was victim of a sexual scandal. At 48, this story is absolutely plausible, while at 7, it is absolutely not. It makes sense that a wise and experienced woman of 48 years old, in addition the wife of the prophet, may take part to the battle in order to help her husband to plan his war strategy. We can imagine that God has reserved the best women for his prophet....So we are not really suprised to see that some sick heart people sought to harm her out of jealousy, as the Arab society was at that time extremely masculine.
Concerning their offsprings, it is not a suprise to see Khadija having 7 children with the prophet as she married him at 25, and we are even less suprised to see Aïsha having no child with the prophet as she married him at 48... The opposite scenario, the one of the Hadiths, is simply impossible.
The horror of the Hadiths' forgeries
The Hadiths go so far that they pretend that when the prophet Muhammad sought for Aïsha in order to marry her, she was playing on the swings ... this story looks like a caricature!
Aisha said: "I was 6 years old when the prophet married me, 9 years old when we started having sexual intercourses". Then she recalled: "... my mother Umm Ruman found me while I was playing on the swings... so they started decorating me. As soon I was ready, the prophet of Allah entered, it was still the morning. Then I was delivered to him." Sahih mouslim, Hadith 114.
The horror of the Hadiths continues with incredible stories which represent a severe insult against the honor of the noble prophet of God and his noble wife Aïsha:
Aïsha reported: "I am used to playing with my dolls in presence of the prophet, and my girlfriends also played with me. When the apostle of God entered, she were used to hiding, but the prophet used to calling them in order for them to join me and to play with me." Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Livre 73, Numéro 151
Aïsha reported that the apostle of Allah married her when she was 7, and she was conducted to his house when she was 9, and she took her dolls with her, and the prophet died, she was 18 years old. Sahih Muslim 8:3311
This insistance on the dolls exposes the willingness to harm Aïsha and to discredit her and the prophet Muhammad!
With wich kind of woman did you get married?"
The prophet was used to having sex with all his wives every night, and he had 9 spouses. Sahih Boukhari, Volume 7, Livre 62, No. 6
These hadiths depict the prophet Muhammad as a sexual maniac, a perverted one, ..., nothing to do with the prophet as depicted in the Quran. The Hadiths are the beast weapon against the prophet and the muslims, by conveying the most abject lies against the prophet and by promoting barbaric and immoral practices such as pedophilia or polygamy. But the most amazing in this, is that the muslims, instead of firmly denying these false stories, are the first to spread them and to defend their authenticity... the worst of them even inspire from these false hadiths. Nowadays, when it is about clashing the prophet Muhammad and islam, the best argument is the marriage of the prophet with Aïsha. It is 100% the fault of the muslims if their enemies take advantage of their perdition in order to undermine them. Today, most of the critics expressed against the muslims are completely justified, and are due to the bad behaviors induced by their false beliefs conveyed by the Hadiths. The muslims persist in their denial, and do not realize how much twhat they value the most: the Hadiths, is the very source of all their problems for centuries. If they abandoned their false beliefs ans stopped their misbehaviours, then Allah would make them successful and blessed again.
The True Path of God, NOT ISLAM
God has made us free men and placed us under His direct authority, which is a great honor, and gave us the Quran, as a Guidance and as an answer to all questions. God has promised us that if we implement his Law, and remain faithful and loyal to Him, then we'll meet only success forever. This is the true Alliance of Allah with the genuine believers, while the Alliance contracted by the muslims is between them and the prophet Muhammad (against his will and without his knowledge, the prophet will deny their association), the companions, the savants of islam ... It is an alliance which bonds men together, while God invites us to contract an Alliance only with Him.
We said: "Get down all of you from this place (the Paradise), then whenever there comes to you Guidance from Me, and whoever follows My Guidance, there shall be no fear on them, nor shall they grieve. S2:V38
Those who are affiliated to the sects which call themselves "religions" (islam, christianity, judaïsm,..., all the organized religions), have violated the pact that they have contracted with God, by leaving by their own will the direct Guidance of God, in order to follow the guidance of their great savants of islam. Therefore, they are now under the authority of their respective religious instances and not under the direct authority of God as we were commanded.
And thus, we put the unfair ones under the authority of each others according to what they have acquired. S6:V129
If not Him ye’ve given your obedience to nothing but people adorned with false titles invented by ye and your fathers (your savants of islam have invented their titles, they have not been appointed by God), and for which Allah hath sent down no authority: the Command is for none but Allah: He hath commanded that ye give your obedience to none but Him: that is the right religion, but Most men do not know. S12:V40
They take their rabbis and their monks (this also works for the preachers, imams, ulemas,...) to be their lords in derogation of Allah, and (they take as their Lord) Christ the son of Mary (this also works with Muhammad who is idolized by the muslims, as if he was an intermediary between them and God); Yet they were commanded to take Allah as their only Lord: there is no god but He. Praise and glory to him: (far is He) from having the partners they associate (with him). S9:V31
Their clergymen tell them that they shall not rely on their personal study of the Books of God, but that they shall only pass by their interpretations. This is the reason why the people of the "sects" have passed from light to darkness, freedom to slavery, knowledge to ignorance, intelligence to stupidity, success to failure, profusion to misery, security to insecurity... paradise to hell.
Most of the people of the religions are today mere sectarians, they prefer the false way of their sect instead of the way of Allah, the one which is defined in Allah's revelations: Torah, Gospels and Quran. As these sectarian people have chosen their own path inspite of God's advice, God has assigned them to their false path ... and their fate is hell, even if they believe the contray.
And whosoever opposes the apostle after the truth hath become manifest unto him, and follows other way than that of the believers, We shall let him follow that to which he has turned, and shall roast him in Hell - an evil retreat! S4:V115
Allah commands us to use our reason in order to validate our beliefs. The manifest proofs concerning this abject slander against the prophet are now available to the public, therefore, there is no more reason for you to continue to believe in this forged story and to spread it again, but at the contrary, you should promote the truth about it thanks to the proofs that you've now learned. For Allah, there is no more unfair people than those who turn their back to the truth once it was manifested to them ... just to stick to their own blind false beliefs, and in order to not be excluded from their own community.
And who is a more unfair than he who fabricates a lie against Allah, and belies the truth when it comes Unto him? S39:V32
And Abraham said: “In Truth, you have adopted these idols instead of Allah to cement the bonds between yourselves the life of this world, but on the Day of Resurrection, you shall disown each other, and curse each other, and your abode will be the Fire, and you shall have no helper.” S29:V25
Many people of the religions have not a true faith in God, but use religion only to be integrated into a community, and in order to look as decent people. These people do not use their own discernment, and will never change their beliefs until their whole community change theirs... Whereas God has commanded us to follow our own way and to standalone with Him, God is enough as a Guide for those who have a genuine faith in Him.
Consequences on islam
If I insist so much on this marriage of Aïsha with the prophet Muhammad, it is because it's a very important event in the history of islam. From generation to generation, all the prominent savants of islam to this day, have always confirmed this story as being authentic. The proof of that, the Wikipedia official pages of the prophet Muhammad and of Aïsha report this false story ... The authors of these pages are no more than the official instances of islam.
Questioning such an important episode in the history of islam, can lead to the complete destruction of the present version of islam. Indeed, the hadiths which report about the age of Aïsha and her marriage with the prophet have been validated as authentic/sahihby the official instances of islam, and by all the generations of savants of islam before that, so acknowleding that this story is actually false, would imply that their whole chain of transmission is wrong. The problem for the instances of islam is that these forged hadiths have been attributed to prestigious names such as Aïsha herself, or Abu Bakr ... which exposes the fact that these hadiths are lies put in the mouth of respectable people. The story of Aïsha's marriage suggesst that many other hadiths may have been forged from scratch and have been falsely attributed to reknown companions of the prophet, in order to give them credit. As the chain of transmission of islam is only based on the reliability of the transmittors and not on the content of the Hadiths, this chain of transmission loses all credibility if it is now established that many important hadiths are in fact complete inventions, including their chain of transmittors.
If such revelation becomes public, the muslims would realize thatt islam has been forged on a lie. The true religion of God, the one truly taught by the prophet Muhammad, has no name and consists simply in directly obeying the Quran and in following the direct Guidance of Allah. Allah has authorized the Hadiths to be spread in order to expose the false believers who will follow the Hadiths instead of the Quran.
Likewise did We make for every Messenger an enemy,― devils/shaytans among men and Jinns, inspiring each other with flowery discourses (the Hadiths when it comes to islam) by way of deception. If thy Lord had so willed, they would not have done it: so leave them and their inventions alone.To such (deceit) let the hearts of those incline, who have no faith in the Hereafter: let them delight in it and let them earn from it what they may. S6:V112-113
This why you can bring all the proofs of the word to the instances of islam, they will never ever acknowledge the truth about this story, otherwise, they would lose their authority and control over the muslims.
The Alliance with God
The sole and only true religion of God is the one taught by Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, and has nothing to do with the religions of today, which are mere sects created by the Devil, an usurpation of the true religion of God. No matter your religion, do not wait for your community to react, use your own reason and freewill, and follow the truth and justice of God. It is very easy to simply leave your religion and to adopt instead the true path of God, you will win at all the levels. God invites you through this message to accept his Alliance: to take Him as your sole and only Guide and Protector, and to follow his Revelations instead of the false laws of your religions. If you accept God's invitation, you will become free men under the sole and direct authority of God, a very prestigious and comfortable position.
Answer the Call of your Lord before there comes from Allah a Day which cannot be averted. You will have no refuge on that Day nor there will be for you any denying. S42:V47
And whosoever answers not Allah's summoner, he cannot do nothing against Allah on the earth, and for him there will be no allies beside Allah. Those are in error manifest. S46:V32
This is what will be your new life if you accept God's fair offer by contracting an Alliance with God, and by breaking your alliance with men, ie your commitment to your present religion/sect:
PSAUME 91
1 Whoever dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty. 2 I will say of the Lord, “He is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust.” 3 Surely he will save you from the fowler’s snare and from the deadly pestilence.4 He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart.5 You will not fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day,6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness, nor the plague that destroys at midday.7 A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you.8 You will only observe with your eyes and see the punishment of the wicked.9 If you say, “The Lord is my refuge,” and you make the Most High your dwelling,10 no harm will overtake you, no disaster will come near your tent.11 For he will command his angels concerning you to guard you in all your ways;12 they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.13 You will tread on the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great lion and the serpent.14 “Because he loves me,” says the Lord, “I will rescue him; I will protect him, for he acknowledges my name.15 He will call on me, and I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble, I will deliver him and honor him.16 With long life I will satisfy him and show him my salvation.”
I testify through my own present life that the promise of God is real, as I enjoy everyday What God promises to his servants. So I invite you to join God and the true believers, and you'll see for yourself that God always keep His promise.